|
Post by bruinsgm on May 16, 2010 21:55:35 GMT -5
To Nashville:Dwayne Roloson, Craig Rivet To Buffalo:Shea Weber, 2011 3rd,2011 5th
Really? please.
|
|
|
Post by mnwildgophers on May 17, 2010 11:30:54 GMT -5
Shea Weber, IMO, would get a lot more than a 40-year old goaltender, and Rivet. It doesn't make sense for either team.
I say we vote to veto this deal.
|
|
|
Post by richierich262 on May 17, 2010 11:36:06 GMT -5
i offered him tim thomas, hemsky , and i said id add prospects or picks.... so im mad
|
|
|
Post by gohabsgo on May 17, 2010 13:06:13 GMT -5
Hey, he said he wanted a veteran goalie, and Rivet, if he wanted more he could have asked, but why veto a deal if each team got what they wanted, and he wanted Weber gone
|
|
|
Post by nyigm on May 17, 2010 15:39:58 GMT -5
Which will now happen as you posted it... lol bad post.
|
|
|
Post by gohabsgo on May 17, 2010 18:31:19 GMT -5
Look, why don't you just let us make our own desiscions?
|
|
|
Post by why2jay on May 18, 2010 10:37:59 GMT -5
Shea Weber, IMO, would get a lot more than a 40-year old goaltender, and Rivet. It doesn't make sense for either team. I say we vote to veto this deal. I agree with this 100% If Nashville ever trades Weber it won't be for a package of guys that will retire within 1 or 2 seasons and some draft picks that may never amount to anything. This trade destroys Nashville Now and Even worse in The Future But Buffalo Makes out Like A Bandit
|
|
|
Post by gohabsgo on May 18, 2010 18:51:05 GMT -5
I agree with you guys, unfair deal
|
|
|
Post by hurricanes1210 on May 18, 2010 20:29:48 GMT -5
unfair
|
|